日本已經支付的4762萬美元： Zaha Hadid Architects have released the following statement relating to the recent decision relating to designs for a new National Stadium in Japan
Zaha Hadid Architects have released the following statement relating to the recent decision relating to designs for a new National Stadium in Japan - See more at: bit.ly/1Mt06cq
Zaha Hadid Architects statement, London, United Kingdom
Tuesday 28 Jul 2015
Zaha Hadid Architects sets the record straight
Zaha Hadid Architects
Zaha Hadid Architects have released the following statement relating to the recent decision relating to designs for a new National Stadium in Japan
“Our teams in Japan and the UK feel it is necessary to set the record straight on the Zaha Hadid Architects (ZHA) design for the new National Stadium for Japan, which has been developed to the client’s brief and budget. It is also only right that the Japanese people are fully aware of the reasons for the reported budget increase and, with exactly five years to go until the Opening Ceremony of the Tokyo 2020 Games, the risks involved with delaying the design process and start of construction.
“In 2012 ZHA was selected by a jury of architects and other experts in an international competition of 46 entries to design a new National Stadium for Japan, which would be ready to welcome the world to Japan for the Rugby World Cup 2019 and Tokyo 2020 Games. We were attracted to the competition by Japan’s vision for a new National Stadium that was designed with the flexibility to open with these two great events and go on to host national, international, local and community sport and cultural events for the next 50 to 100 years.
“The design was developed by a joint venture of leading Japanese design offices led by Nikken Sekkei, with ZHA supervising the design development. The team dedicated thousands of hours to develop a design for a new National Stadium to the brief, requirements and budget of our client, the Japan Sport Council (JSC). At every stage over the two years of development, the design and budget estimates were approved by the JSC. ZHA worked proactively to reduce the estimated cost throughout.
“For the first time in the construction of a public building in Japan, a two-stage tender process was used, in which contractors are appointed before being invited to submit cost estimates. As ZHA has considerable experience in this process we advised the JSC that working to an immovable completion deadline, against a backdrop of rocketing annual increases in the cost of building in Tokyo, and in the absence of any international competition, the early selection of a limited number of construction contractors would not lead to a commercially competitive process.
“Our warning was not heeded that selecting contractors too early in a heated construction market and without sufficient competition would lead to an overly high estimate of the cost of construction.
“ZHA also proposed to the JSC that, in this uncompetitive context, reductions to the client’s brief for the stadium, architectural specification and contractor costs would achieve a lower construction price. ZHA has always been prepared to work with the JSC to produce a lower cost design at any time. The budget and design was approved by the Government on 7th July and there was no subsequent request to design a lower cost stadium.
“In response to the high costs quoted by the construction contractors, ZHA and all of the design team worked hard with the JSC to ensure the developing design was delivered to the brief and budget, coming up with many cost-saving initiatives including further changes to the design. We also provided objective guidance on the standard materials and building techniques required to build the Stadium. In our experience the best way to deliver high-quality and cost-effective projects is for the selected designers to work in collaboration with the construction contractor and client as a single team with a single aim. However, we were not permitted to work with the construction contractors, again increasing the risk of unnecessarily high cost estimates and delays in completion.
“On 7th July a JSC report to the Stadium advisory committee, using figures provided by the appointed construction contractors, incorrectly claimed that the design was responsible for most of the increase in budget. ZHA was not informed in advance of this announcement and we immediately contested this incorrect claim with the JSC. Commentary of the report focused on the steel arches within the design. These arches are not complex and use standard bridge building technology to support the lightweight and strong polymer membrane roof to cover all spectator seats, in addition to supporting the high-specification lighting and services that will enable the Stadium to host many international competitions and events in the future.
“The arched roof structure is as efficient as many other major stadia in Japan and the arches allow the roof to be constructed in parallel with the stadium seating bowl, saving crucial construction time in comparison to a roof supported from the seating bowl, which can only be built after the bowl has been completed. The design and engineering teams in Japan confirmed the arches supporting the roof should cost 23 billion yen (less than 10% of the approved budget).
“The increase in estimated budget reported by the JSC is in fact due to the inflated costs of construction in Tokyo, a restricted and an uncompetitive approach to appointing construction contractors and a restriction on collaboration between the design team and appointed construction contractors, not the design.
“The current building boom in Tokyo increasing construction demand, a limited labour supply and the yen’s significant drop in value greatly increasing the price of imported raw materials have all contributed to Tokyo’s construction costs growing dramatically since 2012/2013 when the new National Stadium project was first announced and Tokyo was awarded the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Between July 2013 and July 2015, Tokyo construction costs increased by an average of 25% and are forecast to increase at a similar rate for the next four years.
“Starting the design process again does not tackle any of the fundamental issues that have led to an increased estimate in budget for the National Stadium, which could in fact become even more problematic due to the significant further delay in starting building. Construction costs will continue to rise towards the immovable deadline of the Tokyo 2020 Games Opening Ceremony in exactly five years.
“In addition to increasing design and construction costs, due to the rising cost of building in Tokyo, further delays and a rushed design process, led by a construction contractor, risk producing a lower standard National Stadium with limited future usage. Other examples around the world show us that a lower quality stadium could require substantial further investment to be converted for long-term use after 2020, when construction costs will be even higher.
“The public, Government and design team have invested in a design that can be delivered through a more competitive procurement process and collaborative approach from construction contractors, within the budget now proposed by the Government and in time to host the Rugby 2019 World Cup.
“We have always been, and still are, prepared to use the expertise and knowledge that has been developed to work with the JSC to produce a lower cost design to a change in specification.
“Ten days after receiving formal approval of the design, ZHA learned through news reports of the cancellation of the commitment to deliver the approved design for the new National Stadium and commitment for the venue to be ready in time to host the Rugby World Cup 2019. Subsequently we received a brief official notification from the Japan Sport Council (JSC) of their cancellation of the contract to design the New National Stadium in Tokyo.
“ZHA remain committed to a flexible and cost-effective new National Stadium that would be ready to welcome the world to Japan for the 2019 Rugby World Cup and become a new home for sport in Japan for many generations to come. The Japanese people, Government and design teams in Japan and the UK have invested a huge amount of time, effort and resources to deliver an adaptable design that can meet the brief and budget set by the Government for a new National Stadium.
“To reduce the risk of further increases in costs, the venue not being ready in time for the Tokyo 2020 Games and being of lower quality, the Prime Minister’s review should build on the investment in the detailed design knowledge already established and focus on the need for construction contractors to work in partnership with this expert team.
“We have written to the Prime Minister to offer our services to support his review of the project with the current design team. ZHA has also outlined how making use of the significant investment in detailed design work already carried out offers the most cost-effective solution to create the best new National Stadium for the people of Japan for the next 50-100 years.
“In the coming weeks we also plan to share, in Japan and across the international design community, the many innovative solutions achieved through the years of work and investment that has gone into the design for the National Stadium.”
Zaha Hadid Architects
- See more at: http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/project/2015/25765/zaha-hadid-architects/zaha-hadid-architects-statement-in-london.html#sthash.jYewFXFj.dpuf
Blogs by Hanching Chung
- ► 2017 (197)
- ► 2016 (313)
- Why Nikkei Is Betting Big...日經新聞 Nikkei 將收買英國金融時報（...
- In Microsoft’s Nokia Debacle, a View of an Industr...
- Leadership: Presidents Eisenhower and Nixon
- Michael Jordan loses China trademark suit: report
- The P-TECH 9-14 model 美國企業搶人 眼光看向青少年
- 柏林新機場“豆腐渣工程” How Berlin’s Futuristic Airport Becam...
- 日本已經支付的4762萬美元： Zaha Hadid Architects have release...
- 倫敦監獄搞烏龍看見犯人PO文嘲笑才知放錯人； 神鬼交鋒真實版在台中上演！通緝犯順利入境越南
- 談"台大醫院院長黃冠棠任期未滿就走人 留下一堆燙手山芋"
- Rome finally abandons 'too complicated' Roman nume...
- 朱敬一為台灣經濟把脈 「政府效率太差」；蔡珠兒【一張良民證】：臺灣駐英國代表處很挑剔......花了...
- 評："義美過期原料小泡芙案 品管人員分遭判刑2至6月"
- 在國際貿易，不宜搞國內民粹...... 衛福部作強盜心虛？
- 法國一周工作35小時？ Average annual hours worked by full-ti...
- 微軟對比蘋果：Compare and contrast: Apple and Microsoft
- 全世界的駭客：團結起來；United Airlines公司的創舉
- "中時"和"聯合"有意：義美凸槌 貯放過期9年食品；、食藥署整義美食品；義美食品必須零缺點
- 沒弄清楚學校與"藥廠" (公司)的區別
- 網友爆料八仙關鍵文件！控新北市政府面臨難逃巨額賠償 : 貝貝
- Pisan Zapra：麥當勞60秒取餐挨轟 今喊卡
- NHK「亞洲黑衣人行動了」【郭董的 決斷】
- Spain's Ciudad Real airport sold at auction for €1...
- 廉航評比 (台)
- 蘋論：開除黨籍不適當 沒有經過民意洗禮的政黨，怎麼可以指導、命令有民意基礎的立委服從黨的領導？
- 中央怎麼說的，只會放屁：預支8億統籌款 苗縣員工薪有著落
- SM娛樂公司怎麼選明星的？首爾總部SM TOWN
- IMF appears to be only one looking out for Greece'...
- 注定失敗的中國證券市場 溫仲然；股市暴跌前 中國政府在幹嘛
- 勝利者將一無所獲？ 評論：獲勝者是——默克爾！
- Nokia plans possible comeback to cellphone busines...
- 地方主管 (新北、苗栗.....)拼命增員：合法的、約聘的.....
- Here’s What the Greek Deal Entails
- 何苦呢：希臘必須完全投降。Alexis Tsipras’s U-turn 此次的改革提議甚至還部分超...
- 多面向看 "柯文哲經濟艙赴韓"
- 全台舉債近6兆5000億元 地方財政危急
- Greek Plan Accepts Austerity 12日週日舉行的歐元區特別峰會決定希臘命...
- 故宮大停電 任遊客摸黑「太離譜」
- HTC 作假的公關公司和廣告 (吳念真)：公司應該跟吳先生道歉、賠償
- 蘋論：年金改革已有社會共識 2015年07月10日
- 正反討論： 希臘拒絕接受歐洲的救助方案，接著政府須跪下？財長辭職！
- 希臘悲喜劇：借錢增福利、Goldman Sachs (高盛投資銀行) 的希臘變戲法
- 希臘銀行繼續關門 人道危機漸顯
- 柯： 醫護人員加班應該實報實銷
- 希臘應該準備放棄歐元 Greece Over the Brink By PAUL KRUGMAN J...
- 畫題的故事：Albert Bierstadt’s "Mount Corcoran"
- Robert Reich：美國高階管理肥貓集： James McNerney (retired a ...
- 希臘是「到處都是有錢人的貧窮國家」Europe’s future in Greece’s hands...
- 轉診靠醫院和家屬自己來 1億2千萬急轉診系統失靈
- 食品安全五項重要的做法 蔡英文 Tsai Ing-wen
- 辦活動假志工之名 (林淑芬)
- Get big or die, ALFA ROMEO
- Hewlett-Packard Officially Files to Split
- 有智慧的慈善事業：台積電捐壓力衣 塵爆傷者每人2套
- ▼ 七月 (82)
- ► 2014 (528)
- ► 2013 (180)
- ► 2012 (275)
- ► 2011 (274)
- ► 2010 (170)
- ► 2009 (168)
- ► 2008 (214)