FCC Agents Trace Radio Interference to Doorbells, Videogames, Blankets
When Signals Interfere With Cell Towers or Radio Broadcasts, Agents Crack Down
March 11, 2014 10:30 p.m. ET
A Woodstock, N.Y., animal sanctuary's electric fence caused interference.
Derek Goodwin
A federal agent who shows up
unannounced at a building along a Texas highway might be looking for any
number of things: illicit drugs or immigration violations, say, or
illegal firearms.
Or fluorescent lights.
Which
was what the agent had in mind who walked into the Perfect Cuts salon
in San Antonio last July. The lights were violating communications
regulations.
The agent had used
signal-tracking equipment to home in on the offenders and told the
owner, Ronald Bethany, that his lights emitted radio signals that
interfered with an
AT&T Inc.
T +0.43%
cellphone tower.
That violated
Federal Communications Commission rules protecting airwaves licensed to
AT&T, the agency determined. Mr. Bethany didn't have a license to
operate on that frequency, the FCC agent told him, so his fixtures
needed to go.
"I told them 'OK, but who is going to pay for this?' " Mr. Bethany says. "I've got to use the lights."
Interference can be serious business. In 2012, hedge-fund mogul
Philip Falcone's
wireless venture, LightSquared Inc., filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy after the FCC determined it would interfere with GPS signals.
The
mixed signals aren't always so weighty. In recent years, the FCC has
issued warning letters directing people to stop operating cordless
phones, television sets and wireless cameras.
Last
June, an FCC letter to a Springfield, Ore., address warned that
"harmful" interference had been traced to the property and that the
operator may have to "cease operation" of the device: "possibly a bad
doorbell transformer."
That 2013 letter lists other common
culprits, including aquarium heaters. Similar letters in 2012 went to
several operators of videogame consoles. "This unresolved problem," the
letters typically warn, "could result in a monetary forfeiture."
The
FCC can demand fines up to $16,000 a day or $112,500 an incident from
people who aren't FCC licensees. Offenders usually rectify problems, the
FCC says, often working them out with whomever is complaining.
Managing
the radio spectrum "has been part of our core mission since the
inception of the FCC in 1934," says Julius Knapp, head of the agency's
Office of Engineering and Technology.
Most
anything electrical can violate. "Incidental radiators," in FCC lingo,
are devices like electric motors that aren't built to generate radio
signals but do anyway. "Unintentional radiators" are designed to
generate signals within devices like computers but aren't supposed to
broadcast. "Intentional radiators" like cordless phones can transgress
when they transmit outside intended frequencies.
Agents
arrived at Shelton's Auto Lube and Auto Wash in Fortuna, Calif., in
2008 looking for signals disrupting AM broadcasts. They traced them to
Shelton's carwash equipment.
"I didn't
know anyone listened to AM radio anymore," says owner Odell Shelton. The
FCC told him a driver complained about car-radio reception. It took a
few days to find and fix the problem.
The government doesn't much care why interference happens. To the FCC, noise is noise.
In
a 2013 letter, the FCC wrote to the owner of a plasma TV set after a
ham-radio operator complained to the agency of interference. "Continued
operation of the television," warned the letter, from which the TV
owner's identification is redacted, "is not legal under FCC rules."
It doesn't matter how far bad signals
extend. The FCC pressed Perfect Fit Industries into a consent decree in
which the Charlotte, N.C., bedding maker agreed to develop a compliance
plan and pay a $7,000 fine in 2005 after some of its electric blankets
caused interference, FCC documents show. Perfect Fit didn't respond to
inquiries.
"Just because it doesn't go very far," says the FCC's Mr. Knapp, "doesn't mean that we don't need to fix it."
Ham-radio
operators are a frequent source of complaints. A 2012 FCC letter told a
Pomona Park, Fla., resident to stop using a well pump that conflicted
with amateur-radio frequencies.
A 2009
letter warned Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary, Woodstock, N.Y., that its
electric fence was causing interference for a ham-radio operator and
noted it had been warned before.
"We
didn't want our rambunctious, dark-colored, 2,000-pound steers pushing
down the fence, wandering onto the adjacent state road and causing a
deadly accident," says sanctuary co-founder Doug Abel.
"Right
next door, our ham-radio-loving neighbor has a 60-foot high antenna
that would allegedly pick up a clicking sound from our fence." He
installed hardware to damp the signals.
Private
signal sleuths, too, hunt down errant emissions.
Jay Jacobsmeyer,
president of wireless-engineering consultants Pericle
Communications Co., investigates interference at 150 to 200 cell sites a
year, mostly for wireless clients. His team last November faced a
puzzling signal in San Diego that would pop up, disappear for weeks,
then resume.
Using directional
equipment, it identified a cordless phone on a yacht that occasionally
visited, Mr. Jacobsmeyer says. The skipper agreed not to use the system
in port.
Radio hobbyist Tom Thompson of
Boulder, Colo., last year tracked a signal using a homemade contraption.
After knocking on the suspect's door, he traced it to ballasts on
marijuana grow-room lights. He says he built a filter that the grower
agreed to use.
Ballasts are frequent
offenders. Makers of the components, which regulate electricity to
bulbs, test them for FCC compliance. Some interfere anyway.
Ballasts
earned Brookfield Office Properties Inc., the real-estate company, a
citation last month at one of its Los Angeles buildings where lights
were interfering with a
Verizon
VZ +0.11%
Communications Inc. cell site. The FCC had warned Brookfield in
May, asking for progress reports, but it received none, the new letter
said. It warned of fines and possible equipment seizure or jail time.
A
spokeswoman for Brookfield says it tries to resolve issues regarding
its properties but doesn't comment on "regulatory matters."
The lights at Perfect Cuts in San Antonio came from
General Electric Co.
GE -0.91%
, which in 2011 found some of its ballasts caused interference, a
spokesman says. GE has offered to replace those ballasts free of charge.
Mr.
Bethany says he initially declined GE's offer. But when an FCC letter
after the agent's visit mentioned a possible $16,000-a-day fine, he
swapped ballasts.
He still doesn't see why he needed to, given that his 18-year-old shop predates the cell tower. "I was here first."
沒有留言:
張貼留言