Converse sues firms over trademark shoe
15 October 2014 Last updated at 06:49
Converse is suing 31 companies over its famous Chuck Taylor shoe
US shoemaker Converse is suing 31 companies, arguing they are copying the design of its trademark shoe.
The company filed lawsuits against big retailers such as Wal-Mart and Ralph Lauren for allegedly selling imitations of its famous Chuck Taylor sneaker.
The lawsuits filed in New York include companies based in Canada, Australia, Italy, China and Japan.
The Nike subsidiary also wants the International Trade Commission to ban imports and sales of the shoes.
Converse chief executive Jim Calhoun said the company welcomed fair competition, but "we do not believe companies have a right to copy the Chuck's trademarked look".
Rise of the sneaker
The popularity of Converse's Chuck Taylor sneaker has skyrocketed over the decades since it was introduced on US basketball courts in 1917.
Converse says it has sold one billion pairs of the shoe around the world and spent hundred of millions of dollars advertising it.
The shoemaker also says it has served about 180 cease and desist letters to retailers selling look-a-like Chuck Taylor sneakers in the past six years to protect its brand.
Prof Polk Wagner, from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, told the BBC that "it is notoriously difficult to win a trademark case in the fashion context".
"It's certainly not a slam-dunk on the part of the plaintiffs," he said.
However, Prof Wagner pointed to a case two years ago when the luxury shoemaker Louboutin successfully trademarked its distinctive red soles.
"Trademark law is all about whether the ordinary consumer would be confused as to the source of the good when they look at it.
"In order for Converse to win they would have to show that the ordinary consumer of their goods... would associate the design-oriented features of that shoe with the manufacturer of that shoe."
廣告
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
Blogs by Hanching Chung
網誌存檔
-
▼
2014
(526)
-
▼
10月
(89)
- 蘋論:總算有部長變聰明啦
- Does design thinking make better businesses?
- Robert Reich: My nomination for worst corporation ...
- 田秋堇立委國會辦公室;食安風暴下的法人處罰技倆與正途 (許澤天)
- 王健壯專欄:這個政府可笑又可悲
- 頂新黑心 重挫台灣食品外銷、內銷
- 《臺灣農家經濟史之重新詮釋》
- 蘋論:魏家退出101不夠贖罪
- CEO Jeff Bezos just got more confounding
- 以價值為基礎的醫療照顧
- Japan's small-car firms are defying the industry's...
- 自主思考的力量 (Larry Page)
- 專訪:"中國埃博拉新藥是一個巨大的黑洞"
- the Vatican rented out the Sistine Chapel to a cor...
- 1974/10月底"中國時報"廣告
- 評頂新案 徐斯儉︰馬政府透過買辦 與中國政治交易
- 統一醬料疑慮比頂新更大(吳家誠);統清? 統一說謊成性? 恐重創
- 西班牙、澳洲和日本供油廠清單
- 戴勝益「王品無法忍」要鬧街
- 蘋論:鱷魚鯊魚返鄉投票
- 綠要政府向頂新求償3百億 供健檢賠償 蘋論:全民奮起 要求國賠;ㄍㄢˋ4800萬公斤 越南噁油台人下肚
- Honda 高官因召回被減薪
- 蘋論:馬英九為何非告王金平不可
- The Spotify effect
- 麥可‧波特再來台灣
- Defective air bags raise questions about automaker...
- McDonald’s new push
- 王品暗槓黑心餐 中市護航
- Takata Faces Rocky Road After Recalls. affected ab...
- 台灣官僚:裝死的政府;可悲的數字遊戲
- 戴勝益:曾到王品23店消費 27日起退費
- 蘋論:奸商的動物本能
- 貴島誠一郎的日劇課 (Ding Fu Yo)
- 中國與歐盟就電信設備爭端達成協議
- IBM 傳擬倒貼 15 億美元將晶片製造燙手山芋丟給 GF
- 義美分享自家油共渡難關
- 關於讓•梯若爾(Jean Tirole)應該知道的五件事
- Every year Neiman Marcus offers a Christmas catalogue
- 書評:谷歌如何工作? "How Google Works", 員工最重要,要以團隊方式招人
- 不要的油裡頭加入具有瀉藥功能的「蓖麻油」?
- 北市民調背後的統計暗號 (王宏恩):推手民調Push Poll;未涵蓋、未表態
- 風評;頂新危機正式進入「無法處理」階段; 蘋論:官商勾結搞飛機;綁架政府沒人敢動;馬的廉政完全破功
- 蘋論:這笑罵由人的無賴政府
- The Pitfalls of Productivity
- 聊聊鼎泰豐 (舒國治)
- Toray公司:日本經濟復甦背後的秘密
- 【壹週刊】最大門神馬英九急切割 ;頂新集團在台4大投資案恐受阻,罩門在台灣之星
- 日本《食品安全基本法》《農林物資規格化和品質表示標準法規》
- 蘋論:混吃等死部;【食藥署不能做縮頭烏龜,必須回應南僑】
- Cloud computing is a trap, warns GNU founder Richa...
- 人工太貴傷不起外企紛紛離中國
- Converse sues firms over trademark shoe
- The growth of China's economy is staggering
- 麥當勞公司如何更"透明":參觀工廠
- 中國味全聲明; 台灣食品業敗類必須全數根除,才有可能恢復商譽與生機
- 台積電:業務面臨威脅;希望能把公司交給關心公司的人
- g0v.tw 台灣零時政府 彙整"財政部關務署網站上提供進出口資料"
- 孫慶餘:人民要這樣的政府何用?
- 統一進飼料油 食藥署保證未進食品鏈 、林淑芬:統一企業......;檢調應該據此立即收押魏應充!這政...
- 台積電 足感心 :只花2個月 氣爆災區高效率重建;免費修繕又快又好
- 追台灣飼料用油的出路;南王化工(段宜康、林淑芬)
- 蘋論:陳佩琪只剩當花瓶嗎
- 黑心企業頂新集團,永遠驅離台灣!:從回台發行TDR,到買台灣之星,味全.....
- 頂新大廈之將傾(江春男);蘋論:且看馬英九怎麼辦頂新
- 高層設計、授意:頂新3年未查廠 靠電話遙控買油
- 壹傳媒工會宣言:你們堵塞言路 我們更感自豪
- 壞油事件層出不窮,危及到政權、談許銘能(衛福部調查事件的主導主持人)、寐良心競選下的暴利與品質管理語...
- 頂新集團收購中嘉網路有線電視系統,受到關注。台灣現在薪資購買力是十多年的1/3
- 追查飼料油製作食品 (林淑芬、段宜康)
- 台灣人畜同等級:正義飼料油 疑製成食品2014年09月16日
- 你相信"黑心油難把關"嗎? 味全還能喊冤說無辜嗎太可惡 味全只採購便宜貨:"味全發布緊急聲明!公佈下...
- 頂新集團一覽;魏家是馬的競選後援會會長:抵制無良企業;頂新正義68項疑慮商品名單;若非衛福部查核不實...
- 梁振英案
- 頂新面對生死存亡之秋;味全頂新產品懶人包
- In the social-media age, bosses' careers are more ...
- 義美食品公司聲明書全文:我們賣的、我們負責!
- 環保署、農委會、食藥署3個主管機關多頭馬車蘋論:混吃等死的行政團隊;綠委上月預警正義油有問題 江宜樺...
- 公司的繼承人規劃與依賴明星業務員的風險
- "豎子"頂新魏家, 魏應充, 蘋論:頂新魏家為富不仁:GMP標章鬧劇;
- 談點產、官、學、軍各界的道德腐化與道德教育,讀"南方朔:王建煊和潘世偉的敗德"
- 義美總經理高志明︰食安問題如何解決;要檢驗脂肪酸!
- Work/Life Integration
- The Washington Post Regains Its Place at the Table
- 企業的分家或出賣某單位,是很平常的事
- 有智慧的警衛人事政策: Google to Make Security Guards Employe...
- 「強冠解雇所有員工 」、社員の7割解雇へ將開罰10萬
- 吳立委質詢合庫無擔保放貸中國企業: 連勝文的致命傷? 「金衛」填海
- 南非開普敦市舉行的「諾貝爾和平獎得主世界高峰會」取消
- 香港緊急救護服務的績效指標及政經關係
-
▼
10月
(89)
沒有留言:
張貼留言